United States of America v. Cesar Humberto Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Cesar Angulo, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto…

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CESAR HUMBERTO ANGULO-FELIX,
a.k.a. Cesar Angulo, a.k.a. Ceasar
Humberto Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Cesar H.
Angulo-Felix, a.k.a. Ceasar Humberto
Angulo-Feliz, a.k.a. Geronimo Arrielo
Lopez,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10212
D.C. No.
2:16-cr-00002-DGC-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 7, 2017**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
FILED
APR 11 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Cesar Humberto Angulo-Felix appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for re-entry of a
removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Angulo-Felix’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are
no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel. We have
provided Angulo-Felix the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro
se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Angulo-Felix waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal
waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88
(9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --