United States of America v. Lucio Najera-Corchado, a.k.a. Lucio Corchado-Najera

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LUCIO NAJERA-CORCHADO, a.k.a.
Lucio Corchado-Najera,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 16-10239
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01192-GMS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 18, 2017**
Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Lucio Najera-Corchado appeals from the revocation of supervised release
and the 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Najera-Corchado’s counsel has filed a brief
FILED
JAN 23 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have considered Najera-Corchado’s October 4, 2016, pro se
submission. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
16-10239 2

-- 2 of 2 --