United States of America v. Lauterio Domingo German- Sanchez, a.k.a. Lauterio D. German- Sanchez

15-10045Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 avr. 2016

Texte intégral

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LAUTERIO DOMINGO GERMAN-
SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Lauterio D. German-
Sanchez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 15-10045
15-10046
D.C. Nos. 4:14-cr-01342-JAS
4:11-cr-02601-JAS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 13, 2016**
Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Lauterio Domingo German-Sanchez appeals
the aggregate 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
FILED
APR 18 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and revocation of
supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
German-Sanchez contends that the district court procedurally erred by
failing to explain the sentence adequately and respond to his mitigating arguments.
We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103,
1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court
considered German-Sanchez’s mitigating arguments and adequately explained the
sentence. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 358-59 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
15-10045 & 15-10046 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.