J. JESUS BARRON-MIRANDA, AKA Jesus Jose Barron v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
J. JESUS BARRON-MIRANDA, AKA
Jesus Jose Barron,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-73263
Agency No. A039-789-464
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 20, 2016**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
J. Jesus Barron-Miranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to
reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252; Alphonsus v. Holder,
705 F.3d 1031, 1036-37 (9th Cir. 2013). We review for abuse of discretion the
FILED
JAN 26 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th
Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Barron-Miranda’s motion to
reconsider because he failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior
order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
We lack jurisdiction to consider Barron-Miranda’s contentions regarding
relief under the Convention Against Torture because he did not raise them in his
motion to reconsider. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
12-73263 2

-- 2 of 2 --