ADRIAN RAY-DURAN, AKA Adrian Duran Ray v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

13-70301Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 mai 2015

Texte intégral

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADRIAN RAY-DURAN, AKA Adrian
Duran Ray,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-70301
Agency No. A200-870-037
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 13, 2015**
Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Adrian Ray-Duran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We dismiss the petition for
review.
FILED
MAY 20 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

The BIA did not err in determining that Ray-Duran waived any challenge to
the IJ’s determination that Ray-Duran was subject to the heightened standard of
hardship for a waiver of inadmissability under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). Accordingly,
we lack jurisdiction to consider Ray-Duran’s contentions regarding the IJ’s
determination that Ray-Duran was subject to the heightened standard of hardship,
because he failed to raise the issue with the BIA and therefore failed to exhaust his
administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.
2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
13-70301 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.