United States of America v. Eduardo Martinez-Gloria

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDUARDO MARTINEZ-GLORIA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10126
D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01867-RCC-
HCE-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2014 **
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Eduardo Martinez-Gloria appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 50-month sentence for reentry after
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez-Gloria’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are
FILED
JUL 10 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We
have provided Martinez-Gloria the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Martinez-Gloria has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 50-month
sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the
appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,
986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --