Marisa Atin v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARISA ATIN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-73240
Agency No. A099-905-254
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 18, 2014**
Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Marisa Atin, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under
FILED
FEB 24 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v.
Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.
The record does not compel the conclusion that the incidents of mistreatment
Atin suffered as a child and young adult, even cumulatively, rise to the level of
persecution. See id. at 1059-60 (two incidents of beating and robbery as a minor
and being accosted by mob did not compel finding of past persecution); Halim v.
Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 975-76 (9th Cir. 2009) (mistreatment as youth and beating
by rioters did not compel finding of past persecution). Further, substantial
evidence supports the agency’s finding that Atin failed to establish a well-founded
fear of persecution because, even under disfavored group analysis, she did not
demonstrate sufficient individualized risk. See id. at 979 (petitioner failed to show
he was individually targeted or likely to be individually targeted where he “failed
to offer any evidence that distinguishes his exposure from those of all other ethnic
Chinese Indonesians”); cf. Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, Atin’s asylum claim fails.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
12-73240 2

-- 2 of 2 --