Ignacio Rivera-Librado v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IGNACIO RIVERA-LIBRADO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-70722
Agency No. A095-805-745
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 14, 2013**
Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Ignacio Rivera-Librado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to
reconsider the BIA’s prior order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding him removable and ineligible for relief. We have
FILED
AUG 16 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-70722 2
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of
a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.
2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA was within its discretion in denying Rivera-Librado’s motion to
reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s prior decision affirming the IJ’s finding that Rivera-Librado was removable
and ineligible for relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C); Socop-Gonzalez v. INS,
272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc). .
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --