RUDOLPH GEORGE STANKO, Individually and on behalf of similarly situated citizens v. United States of America, c/o Attorney General of the United States

11-35965Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 févr. 2013

Texte intégral

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RUDOLPH GEORGE STANKO,
Individually and on behalf of similarly
situated citizens,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, c/o
Attorney General of the United States,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-35965
D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00116-RFC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Richard F. Cebull, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 11, 2013**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Rudolph George Stanko appeals from the district court’s judgment
dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his petition for declaratory relief
FILED
FEB 19 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-35965 2
and certification under 28 U.S.C. §2403(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. We review de novo. Schnabel v. Lui, 302 F.3d 1023, 1029 (9th Cir.
2002). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Stanko
failed to show a real case or controversy sufficient to warrant the issuance of a
declaratory judgment. See Am. Rivers v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 126 F.3d
1118, 1123 (9th Cir. 1997) (“A federal court does not have jurisdiction to give
opinions upon moot questions or abstract propositions, or to declare principles or
rules of law which cannot affect the matter in issue in the case before it.” (citations
and internal quotation marks omitted)); Levin Metals Corp. v. Parr-Richmond
Terminal Co., 799 F.2d 1312, 1315 (9th Cir. 1986) (“The Declaratory Judgment
Act is not an independent source of federal subject matter jurisdiction.”).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.