Sandra Patricia Morales- Mazariegos v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANDRA PATRICIA MORALES-
MAZARIEGOS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-70660
Agency No. A070-781-185
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 15, 2013**
Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Sandra Patricia Morales-Mazariegos, a native and citizen of Guatemala,
petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
denying her motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.
FILED
JAN 16 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider.
Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part
and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Morales-Mazariegos’s
motion to reconsider where the motion failed to establish any error of law or fact in
the BIA’s prior order denying Morales-Mazariego’s motion to reopen. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
To the extent that Morales-Mazariegos challenges the BIA’s underlying
order denying her motion to reopen, we lack jurisdiction because this petition is
not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petitions for review must be
filed within 30 days of the order); Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.
2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
11-70660 2

-- 2 of 2 --