RAUL RAMOS, Jr. v. MICHAEL EVANS, Warden

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior District Judge for the U.S.**
District Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAUL RAMOS, Jr.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL EVANS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 10-55758
D.C. No. 2:08-cv-08070-JSL-SS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
J. Spencer Letts, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 7, 2012
Pasadena, California
Before: D.W. NELSON and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON,
Senior District Judge.**
Petitioner Raul Ramos appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for
habeas corpus, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the state
FILED
NOV 28 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

court unreasonably applied the Supreme Court's decision in Jackson v. Virginia,
443 U.S. 307 (1979), in concluding that there was sufficient evidence to find that
his prior offense constituted a strike under the California Three Strikes Law. We
disagree. Under AEDPA, we apply the standards of Jackson with an additional
layer of deference. See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274 (9th Cir. 2005).
Under that deferential standard, a rational trier of fact could have found that
Ramos’s prior conviction constituted a strike.
Ramos did not raise his claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466
(2000) in his federal habeas petition, and thus, the claim is barred under AEDPA’s
one-year statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C.§ 2244(d)(1)(A).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --