United States of America v. Claudia Farias-Sanchez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDIA FARIAS-SANCHEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-30214
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-06097-LRS-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 17, 2012**
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Claudia Farias-Sanchez appeals from the 30–month sentence imposed
following her guilty-plea conviction for being found in the United States after
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JUL 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 11-30214
Farias-Sanchez contends that the sentence was substantively unreasonable.
Her sentence below the Guidelines range was not substantively unreasonable in
light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing
factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --