Timothy Paul Olmos v. CHARLES L. RYAN and ALLEN ORTEGA

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES L. RYAN and ALLEN
ORTEGA,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 12-15233
D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02564-GMS-MEA
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2012**
Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Timothy Paul Olmos appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his
request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
FILED
JUL 05 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 12-15233
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying
preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its
discretion. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir. 2008); see
Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008) (listing
factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l,
686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --