Juan Manuel Angulo-Morgan v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN MANUEL ANGULO-MORGAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-72089
Agency No. A078-246-960
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 15, 2012**
Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Juan Manuel Angulo-Morgan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s reinstatement of a prior order of removal. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
FILED
MAY 23 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

06-72089 2
Our review of a reinstatement order is limited to the agency’s compliance
with the reinstatement regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 1241.8. Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t
of Homeland Security, 539 F.3d 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 2008) (listing the three
determinations underlying a reinstatement order that may be reviewed). Angulo-
Morgan does not challenge the agency’s compliance with the reinstatement
regulations. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See Padilla v.
Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921, 925 (9th Cir. 2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --