Texte intégral
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANDY JAMES JANGULA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 11-30334
11-30335
D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00048-SEH
4:03-cr-00038-SEH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 15, 2012**
Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the
consecutive 12-month sentences imposed following revocation of supervised
release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jangula contends that his aggregate sentence is substantively unreasonable.
FILED
MAY 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
11-30334 2
In light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors enumerated
in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States
v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
