SWEET PEOPLE APPAREL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Miss Me v. LA IDOL FASHION, INC., a California corporation

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SWEET PEOPLE APPAREL, INC., a
California corporation, DBA Miss Me;
RCRV, INC., a California corporation,
DBA Rock Revival,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
LA IDOL FASHION, INC., a California
corporation,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-56785
D.C. No. 2:11-cv-06849-SVW-FFM
ORDER*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submission Deferred May 4, 2012
Resubmitted May 15, 2012**
Pasadena, California
FILED
MAY 17 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the***
Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
2
Before: NOONAN and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and GRITZNER, Chief District
Judge.***
This case is ordered resubmitted on May 15, 2012.
On May 2, 2012, in response to this Court’s order to show cause, Appellees
submitted a letter brief stating that upon issuance of the District Court’s permanent
injunction, this appeal would become moot. Appellees requested that this Court
dismiss the appeal upon issuance of the permanent injunction “without further
briefing or requests from the parties.”
On May 11, 2012, in response to this Court’s order deferring submission of
this appeal, Appellees filed a notice informing the Court that a permanent
injunction was issued by the District Court on May 7, 2012. Appellants have not
responded to this Court’s order to show cause, Appellees’ letter brief or the notice.
The Court construes Appellees’ notice, in conjunction with their earlier letter
brief, as a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot. The motion is GRANTED.
Transmission of a copy of this order to the District Court shall constitute the
mandate of this Court.

-- 2 of 2 --