Adelaide Nzeusseu v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADELAIDE NZEUSSEU,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-71325
Agency No. A095-414-778
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Adelaide Nzeusseu, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petition for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen
removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
FILED
MAR 02 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-71325 2
abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d
988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Nzeusseu’s motion to
reopen as untimely where the motion was filed over three years after the BIA’s
final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Nzeusseu failed to present evidence
of changed circumstances in Cameroon to qualify for an exception to the time
limit, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Toufighi, 538 F.3d at 996-97 (underlying
adverse credibility determination rendered evidence of changed circumstances
immaterial).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --