Wilfredo Mariel Ramos- Tejada v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

10-71800Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 févr. 2012

Texte intégral

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILFREDO MARIEL RAMOS-
TEJADA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71800
Agency No. A097-879-512
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Wilfredo Mariel Ramos-Tejada, a native and citizen of
Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order
dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for
FILED
FEB 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 10-71800
cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Ramos-Tejada failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his
U.S. citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,
552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.