United States of America v. Daniel Ramsey

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DANIEL RAMSEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-10302
D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00398-SBA
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Ramsey appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 60-month sentence
for conspiracy to commit armed robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramsey’s counsel has filed a brief
FILED
FEB 23 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-10302 2
stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel
of record. We have provided Ramsey with the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. Ramsey has filed a pro se brief and the government has filed
an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --