Ali Asghar v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALI ASGHAR,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71679
Agency No. A058-472-408
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Ali Asghar, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s removal order and denying his motion to remand. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo constitutional claims and
FILED
JAN 06 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-71679 2
review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to remand. Castillo-Perez v.
INS, 212 F.3d 518, 523 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Asghar’s motion to remand.
Asghar contends that his due process rights were violated by the interpretation of
his master calendar hearings into Urdu, rather than his native language of Hindko,
but he has not established prejudice resulting from the alleged violation. See
Perez-Lastor v. INS, 208 F.3d 773, 780 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring both error and
prejudice to prevail on a due process claim based on an incompetent
interpretation).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --