United States of America v. Jackson Bryant Baugus

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JACKSON BRYANT BAUGUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-30215
D.C. No. 1:02-cr-00133-SEH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Jackson Bryant Baugus appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his
motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.
FILED
DEC 22 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-30215 2
Baugus contends that the district court improperly applied $7,724 in seized
funds to an unsatisfied fine of $75,000 imposed in connection with his 2004
criminal judgment. Contrary to Baugus’s contention, the district court did not err.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3613(c). Consideration of Baugus’s remaining claims is precluded
pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata. See Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 892
& n.5 (2008); United States v. Bhatia, 545 F.3d 757, 759 (9th Cir. 2008); see also
United States v. Baugus, Nos. 07-30046 and 07-30353, 2009 Westlaw 159228 (9th
Cir. Jan 13, 2009).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --