United States of America v. Luis Alberto Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Alberto Juares-Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Alberto…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUIS ALBERTO GARCIA, a.k.a. Luis
Alberto Juares-Garcia, a.k.a. Luis Alberto
Juarez-Garcia,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-10107
D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02103-FRZ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2011**
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Luis Alberto Garcia appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month
sentence imposed for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia’s counsel has filed a
FILED
NOV 03 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-10107 2
brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --