United States of America v. Eliza H.r. Bighetty, a.k.a. Eliza Batarseh, a.k.a. Eliza Hume Rambo Kruse, a.k.a.…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ELIZA H.R. BIGHETTY, a.k.a. Eliza
Batarseh, a.k.a. Eliza Hume Rambo Kruse,
a.k.a. Eliza Shuys, a.k.a. Eliza
Steward/Stewart,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-30009
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00228-JLR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2011**
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Eliza H.R. Bighetty appeals from the 48-month sentence imposed following
her guilty-plea convictions for aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
FILED
OCT 28 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-30009 2
§ 1028A, and for theft of government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Bighetty contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable. The
record reflects that Bighetty’s within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable in light of
the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors.
See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --