Alejandro M. Contreras Wiltron v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEJANDRO M. CONTRERAS
WILTRON,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74449
Agency No. A097-354-953
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 19, 2010**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Alejandro M. Contreras Wiltron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for
FILED
OCT 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74449 2
abuse of discretion, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), we
deny the petition for review.
The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Contreras Wiltron’s motion
to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s July 25, 2008, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --