In re: GTI CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, DBA Rockland Materials v. Comerica Bank;

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: GTI CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC,
DBA Rockland Materials,
Debtor,
TRIAD COMMERCIAL CAPTIVE CO.;
et al.,
Appellants,
v.
COMERICA BANK; et al.,
Appellees.
No. 09-60003
BAP No. AZ-08-1079-MkEMo
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Montali, Markell, and Efremsky, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted October 6, 2010**
San Francisco, California
Before: THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
FILED
OCT 08 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
Appellants appeal the bankruptcy court’s approval of a settlement between
Appellees David Reaves, the bankruptcy trustee, and Comerica Bank. However,
Appellants’ brief does not identify any error in any of the bankruptcy court’s
rulings.
Rather, Appellants appear to be seeking on appeal an advisory opinion about
the effects of the settlement agreement on other litigation. We lack jurisdiction to
render advisory opinions. See Kittel v. Thomas, 610 F.3d 1115, 1117 (9th Cir.
2010).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --