GREGORY McCLELLAN v. David Mountain; P. Heard

09-15596Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 oct. 2010

Texte intégral

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY McCLELLAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID MOUNTAIN; P. HEARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 09-15596
D.C. No. 1:09-cv-00256-LJO-GSA
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Gregory McClellan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims concerning parole
conditions and revocation of parole. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We review de novo. Weilburg v. Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007).
FILED
OCT 06 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-15596 2
We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. Johnson v. Riverside
Healthcare Sys. LP, 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm in part,
vacate in part, and remand.
We affirm the dismissal of McClellan’s claims challenging parole
conditions. See Hatton v. Bonner, 356 F.3d 955, 961-67 (9th Cir. 2004) (rejecting
ex post facto challenge); Neal v. Shimoda, 131 F.3d 818, 826-27 (9th Cir. 1997)
(same); see also United States v. Bee, 162 F.3d 1232, 1234-35 (9th Cir. 1998)
(rejecting constitutional challenge to condition of supervised release).
However, we vacate the dismissal under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477
(1994), of McClellan’s claim challenging parole revocation. The district court did
not expressly consider the Heck exception set forth in Nonnette v. Small, 316 F.3d
872 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for further proceedings
on this claim.
McClellan shall bear his own costs on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.