United States of America v. VERNON ALVIN LOUISVILLE, Jr.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VERNON ALVIN LOUISVILLE, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10285
D.C. No. 4:06-CR-00698-DLJ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Vernon Alvin Louisville, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
SEP 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-10285 2
Louisville contends his sentence does not reflect the reduction provided for
in Amendment 706 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The district court
properly denied the motion on the ground that Louisville had already received the
benefit of the Guidelines amendment as he pleaded guilty and was sentenced after
the amendment went into effect.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --