Jesus Ramos Vallejo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESUS RAMOS VALLEJO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74840
Agency No. A092-060-411
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Jesus Ramos Vallejo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
SEP 24 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-74840 2
This court lacks jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination
that Ramos Vallejo did not merit cancellation of removal. See Romero-Torres v.
Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 2003) (this court lacks jurisdiction to
consider “all discretionary decisions involved in the cancellation of removal
context, including the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief”).
Ramos Vallejo’s contention that the IJ failed to properly weigh his equities
is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable claim over which
we have jurisdiction. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir.
2009).
Ramos Vallejo’s remaining contention is unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --