Anayeliy Galvan v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANAYELIY GALVAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74704
Agency No. A095-177-080
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Anayeliy Galvan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,
FILED
SEP 23 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74704 2
Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for
review.
The BIA properly concluded that Galvan is statutorily ineligible for
cancellation of removal because she was convicted of two crimes involving moral
turpitude. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C) (an alien is ineligible for cancellation of
removal if convicted of an offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)).
Galvan’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --