Jose De Jesus Alcantar- Navarro, a.k.a. Jose Navarro, a.k.a. Jaime Pimental, a.k.a.… v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE DE JESUS ALCANTAR-
NAVARRO, a.k.a. Jose Navarro, a.k.a.
Jaime Pimental, a.k.a. Jose Alcantar
Navarro,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-71934
Agency No. A037-442-639
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Jose de Jesus Alcantar-Navarro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro
se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his
appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for
FILED
SEP 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-71934 2
cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
deny in part and dismiss the petition for review.
Alcantar-Navarro has not challenged the BIA’s determination that he is
removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) (conviction for violation of law
related to a controlled substance) and (a)(2)(C) (certain firearms offenses). We
need not consider Alcantar-Navarro’s contention that his convictions are not
aggravated felonies, because the BIA stated that the crimes were not aggravated
felonies.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision denying
cancellation of removal. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th
Cir. 2005).
Alcantar-Navarro’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --