Mohammad Salameh v. Peter Carlson;

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes these appeals are suitable for**
decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MOHAMMAD SALAMEH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER CARLSON; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Nos. 08-56040
08-57068
D.C. No. 2:98-cv-08493-SVW-
MLG
MEMORANDUM*
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Mohammad Salameh, a federal prisoner who is currently housed in
Colorado, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment following a bench trial
in his Bivens action alleging defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by
FILED
JUL 20 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-57068 2
using excessive force. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
de novo the district court’s legal conclusions and review for clear error its findings
of fact. Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 793 (9th Cir. 2003).
We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s award of costs to a
prevailing party. Save Our Valley v. Sound Transit, 335 F.3d 932, 944 n.12 (9th
Cir. 2003). We affirm.
The district court did not clearly err when it made credibility determinations
and concluded, based on those findings, that defendant Swanson did not use
excessive force when transferring Salameh. See Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1,
7 (1992) (the core judicial inquiry in an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim
is whether the “force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore
discipline, or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm”).
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Salameh’s motion
to re-tax costs after considering Salameh’s financial situation and his ability to pay
awarded costs. See Save Our Valley, 335 F.3d at 944-45.
Salameh’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --