Vicenta Lopez-Bobadilla v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VICENTA LOPEZ-BOBADILLA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71090
Agency No. A072-168-238
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Vicenta Lopez-Bobadilla, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for relief under the
FILED
JUL 12 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71090 2
Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”). We dismiss the
petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Lopez-
Bobadilla was not eligible for NACARA relief because she failed to establish that
she timely registered for ABC benefits, and she does not raise a legal or
constitutional question that invokes our jurisdiction. See Lanuza v. Holder, 597
F.3d 970, 972 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).
We lack jurisdiction to consider Lopez-Bobadilla’s remaining contentions,
because she failed to exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358
F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining that this court lacks jurisdiction to
review contentions not raised before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --