Anastacio Galvan-Felix v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANASTACIO GALVAN-FELIX,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-70008
Agency No. A074-083-189
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
San Francisco, California
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Anastacio Galvan-Felix a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denying his motion to
reconsider the underlying denial of his application for cancellation of relief based
FILED
JUN 03 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-70008 2
on his failure to establish the requisite hardship to a qualifying relative. The BIA
denied the motion as untimely.
Galvan-Felix contends that the BIA erred by not finding exceptional and
extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen wife. Galvan-Felix also
contends that his due process rights were violated.
Galvan-Felix has not raised any challenges to the BIA’s denial of his motion
to reconsider as untimely, and therefore he has waived any challenge to that
decision. See Martinez-Rios v. Holder, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues
not supported by argument in a brief are deemed abandoned).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --