Justa Alejandra Vasquez Arellanes v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
RB/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUSTA ALEJANDRA VASQUEZ
ARELLANES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 05-76399
Agency No. A079-573-160
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Justa Alejandra Vasquez Arellanes, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of
FILED
MAR 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

RB/Research 05-76399 2
removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
substantial evidence factual findings of the IJ. Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1266
(9th Cir. 2001). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Vasquez Arellanes
provided false testimony for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit,
thereby rendering her unable to establish the requisite good moral character for
cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f)(6), 1229b(b)(1)(B); see also
Ramos, 246 F.3d at 1266.
Vasquez Arellanes’ remaining contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --