Terry M. Turner v. City and County of Honolulu;

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JS/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERRY M. TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU;
et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-16410
D.C. No. 1:06-CV-00616-JMS-
LEK
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Hawaii
J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 11, 2010**
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Terry M. Turner appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment
in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his constitutional rights and
FILED
JAN 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JS/Research 08-16410 2
negligence in connection with criminal proceedings against him. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, ACLU of Nev. v. City of
Las Vegas, 466 F.3d 784, 790-91 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants on
statute of limitations grounds because Turner failed to raise a triable issue as to
whether the limitations period was tolled after July 2004, and he did not file this
action until more than two years later. See Canatella v. Van de Kamp, 486 F.3d
1128, 1132 (9th Cir. 2007) (explaining that, for section 1983 actions, courts apply
the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury actions and that state’s
tolling provisions); Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-7 (providing two-year statute of
limitations for personal injury actions under Hawaii law); Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-13
(allowing for tolling of the limitations period for insanity or imprisonment); Buck
v. Miles, 971 P.2d 717, 724-25 (Haw. 1999) (defining insanity for tolling
purposes).
Turner’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --