United States of America v. Jesus Flores-Mancera

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
EH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JESUS FLORES-MANCERA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-30026
D.C. No. 1:08-CR-00199-EJL
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 15, 2009**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Jesus Flores-Mancera appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed
following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §
1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JAN 11 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

EH/Research 09-30026 2
Flores-Mancera contends that the district court unreasonably applied the
sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), thereby rendering his sentence
substantively unreasonable. A review of the record demonstrates that the judge
considered many of the § 3553 factors and that given the totality of the
circumstances, Flores-Mancera’s sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States,
552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --