Jose Luis Rebolledo Rodriguez v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jlf/Inventory
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE LUIS REBOLLEDO RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72140
Agency Nos. A095-196-303
A095-196-304
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 15, 2009 **
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Jose Luis Rebolledo Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro
se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his fourth motion to
reopen the underlying denial of his application for cancellation of removal.
FILED
JAN 11 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

jlf/Inventory 08-72140 2
Petitioner sought to reopen based on new evidence to establish the requisite
hardship to his qualifying relatives by providing evidence that his United States
citizen son Angel has developed severe asthma and a speech impairment, and
petitioner has a newborn United States citizen child.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s fourth motion to
reopen as untimely and numerically barred, and the motion did not meet any of the
regulatory exceptions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) - (3). Because the motion is
time and numerically barred, we deny the petition for review, and we need not
address petitioner’s remaining challenge.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --