United States v. Gustavo Villa-Maldonado

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2651
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Mark L. Flaaen, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 23, 2011
Filed: December 7, 2011
___________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Mark Flaaen appeals the sentence the district court imposed after revoking his1
supervised release. We conclude that the revocation sentence of 20 months in prison
with 40 months of supervised release was not unreasonable. We decline to review
at this time Flaaen’s arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel and
sentence credit. See United States v. Davis, 452 F.3d 991, 994 (8th Cir. 2006);
United States v. Pardue, 363 F.3d 695, 699 (8th Cir. 2004). With respect to Flaaen’s
remaining arguments, we find no plain error. See Davis, 452 F.3d at 994 (describing
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western1
District of Missouri.

-- 1 of 2 --

plain-error review); see also United States v. Asalati, 615 F.3d 1001, 1007-08 (8th
Cir. 2010) (upholding curfew condition of supervised release).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --