Texte intégral
1The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-2847
___________
David Johnson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Port City Janitors’ Supply *
& Paper Company, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: October 5, 2009
Filed: October 8, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
David Johnson appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court’s ensuing denial of
his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV,
Inc., 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the
reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759,
775 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-- 2 of 2 --
