John D. Johnson v. State of IA

00-1293Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit31 août 2000

Texte intégral

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 00-1346
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Northern
v. * District of Iowa.
*
Sondra Readshaw * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: May 19, 2000
Filed: August 7, 2000
___________
Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Sondra Readshaw appeals her drug-related sentence. Having carefully
considered the record, we briefly summarize Readshaw's argument and our reason for
rejecting it. Readshaw does not dispute that after a co-defendant sold two ounces of
methamphetamine to an undercover officer, Readshaw offered to make two more
ounces available to the officer, and he told her he would let her know about other
interested customers. Based on this factual account, Readshaw contends the quantity
of methamphetamine she offered should not be used to set her base offense level
because the undercover officer did not commit to purchase the methamphetamine from

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
her. We disagree. Just as the officer was not required to consummate the transaction,
we do not believe he was required to do more than agree to put Readshaw in touch with
prospective customers. See United States v. Smiley, 997 F.2d 475, 482 (8th Cir. 1993)
(in affirming inclusion of quantity defendant agreed to sell, noting defendant's initiation
of offer to sell drugs to agent); United States v. Garrido, 995 F.2d 808, 812 n.3 (8th
Cir.) ("agent did not need to intend actually to buy the amount suggested" for quantity
under negotiation to be countable), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 926 (1993). The agents'
commitment to purchase drugs in the Smiley and Garrido cases is analogous to the
undercover officer's commitment to tell Readshaw about other interested customers in
this case; it was not necessary for the officer to intend actually to follow through on his
commitment. We thus affirm Readshaw's sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.