Wilkinson v. Transco Exploration, et al

99-60784Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit14 juil. 2000

Texte intégral

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60784
CHARLES H. WILKINSON, JR., ET. AL.,
Plaintiffs,
J. E. STACK, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
TRANSCO EXPLORATION CO., ET. AL.,
Defendants,
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY; RICHARD BERTRAM & COMPANY;
ALBERT F. THOMASSON; BURGESS A. THOMASSON,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:99-CV-204-WS
--------------------
July 12, 2000
Before POLITZ, JONES & STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This court has carefully considered Stack’s appeal in
light of the oral arguments, briefs and pertinent portions of the
record. Having done so, we conclude that the district court did
not abuse his discretion in disallowing Stack’s proposed
significant and substantive amendment to the now 16-year old
litigation. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 2 --

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.