Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60575
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY MOORE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 4:98-CR-23-ALL-B
--------------------
June 12, 2000
Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Larry Moore has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Moore was notified of
counsel’s motion and brief, and he has filed a request for
different court-appointed counsel. Our independent review of the
record, and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous
issues for appeal. Consequently, Moore’s motion for different
court-appointed counsel is DENIED, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 99-60575
- 2 -
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
