Texte intégral
No. 99-10535
-1-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10535
Conference Calendar
ANTHONY T. THOMAS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
J. SAWYER ET Al.,
Defendants,
J. BALL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:97-CV-2475
--------------------
February 17, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Justin Ball appeals the district court's denial of his
motion for summary judgment in Thomas’s civil rights suit. Ball
argues that the district court erred by denying his summary-
judgment motion and that this court has jurisdiction over the
interlocutory appeal. Because there is a significant fact-
related dispute with regard to Thomas’s brutality claim, this
court does not have jurisdiction to review the district court’s
denial of the motion for summary judgment on this claim. See
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 99-10535
-2-
Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 313 (1995). Thus, Ball’s appeal
is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
-- 2 of 2 --
