Lingle v. Cain

98-30913Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit7 déc. 2000

Texte intégral

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-30913
Summary Calendar
SCOTT LINGLE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
BURL CAIN, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
(97-CV-1263-N)
--------------------
December 7, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Petitioner-Appellant Scott Lingle appeals the district court’s
denial of relief in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition.
Lingle argues that the reasonable doubt jury instruction given at
his trial was constitutionally defective under Cage v. Louisiana,
498 U.S. 39 (1990). The AEDPA precludes consideration of this
claim. Williams v. Cain, 229 F.3d 468, 473-75 (5th Cir. 2000).
Accordingly, the district court’s denial of relief is
AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.