United States v. Robles-Enriquez

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 24, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-40389
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAIME ROBLES-ENRIQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-913-ALL
--------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime
Robles-Enriquez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Robles-
Enriquez has not filed a response to counsel’s motion.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --