Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-20119
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELIX GREGORIO CAICEDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:93-CR-67-1
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Felix Gregorio Caicedo has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Caicedo was informed of his
right to respond but has not done so. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
