Springfield v. Heilig-Meyers, et al

04-60379Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit14 mars 2005

Texte intégral

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should
not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth
in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________________
No. 04-60379
Summary Calendar
__________________________
DWIGHT T SPRINGFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HEILIG-MEYERS FURNITURE COMPANY; RICKY SLAUGHTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
___________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
Northern District of Mississippi, Greenville
(No. 4:02-CV-161-P-D)
___________________________________________________
Before GARZA, DEMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-appellant Springfield appeals from the district court’s decision granting
summary judgment on his Title VII, intentional torts, negligence and wrongful termination
claims. For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s order, we AFFIRM.

-- 1 of 1 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.