Texte intégral
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
July 28, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-51169
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANIEL OCHOA-OROPEZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:04-CR-272-4
--------------------
Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Daniel Ochoa-Oropeza has moved for leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ochoa-Oropeza has not filed a response.
Our review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.
42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --