Texte intégral
* Pursuant to the 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 5, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-41215
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
Terrick Durham,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:04-CR-26-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for Terrick Durham moved for leave to withdraw and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California.1 Durham did not
file a response. After review of counsel’s brief and of the
record, we conclude that no nonfrivolous issues remain for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
-- 1 of 2 --
2 See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
appeal is DISMISSED.2
-- 2 of 2 --
