Morris v. Warren, et al

03-41604Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit19 avr. 2004

Texte intégral

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 20, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-41604
Conference Calendar
DAVID GENE MORRIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MISTY D. WARREN, Mailroom Supervisor;
JANE DOE, Unknown Mailroom Employee;
BENNIE COLEMAN, Grievance Officer;
ETHAN A. WASTFALL, Assistant Warden;
ROSEMARY HEINSOHN, Program Administrator;
DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:03-CV-411
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
David Gene Morris, Texas prisoner # 285845, appeals the
district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) dismissal as frivolous
and for failure to state a claim of his civil rights lawsuit,
asserting that he had been denied access to the courts when his
legal mail was not properly processed. The district court’s

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-41604
-2-
dismissal is reviewed de novo. See Ruiz v. United States,
160 F.3d 273, 274-75 (5th Cir. 1998).
To establish that he has been denied access to court, a
prisoner must show actual prejudice in his ability to pursue a
legal claim. See Walker v. Navarro County Jail, 4 F.3d 410, 413
(5th Cir. 1993). Morris has not shown that his position as a
litigant has been prejudiced in any way, and, as the district
court determined, his claim fails. See id. The appeal is
without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard
v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Both the district court’s dismissal and this court’s
dismissal of the instant appeal count as strikes for purposes of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383,
385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Morris is CAUTIONED that if he
accumulates three strikes, he will not be able to proceed
in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he
is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.